Let the world know!

Sunday, December 19, 2010

EXPANDING! Advertising and Giveaways ect...

I'm going big or going home.  I've been receiving a few emails lately about advertising and other type of product placement opportunities and hey, I'm looking for  more partnerships and advertising opportunities. 
If you are a business, please contact me and we can work something out.




ADVERTISING/SPONSORS:

If you feel you or your company would relate to my readers email me with details of how you would like to advertise.  You may email me your own proposal for rates if you wish; I am open to your ideas.

Ella is currently accepting sponsors and advertisors of all types. Let me know how you would like to sponsor my blog or any other ideas you may have.



GIVEAWAYS:

If you would like to donate an item for a giveaway, please let me know. I am always happy to give back to my readers and giveaways are a great way to do that, as well as to advertise your company.



PRODUCT PLACEMENT/REVIEWS:

I will be happy to feature and showcase an item sent to me as desired.  I will only accept items I feel will relate to myself and my viewers.  Email me with how you would like me to feature the item (outfit post, review, both, etc.)


OTHER:

If you have any other partnership ideas feel free to email me with a proposal. I am willing to work with you to find a solution that works for both of us.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

WHAT?! Roitfeld leaving French Vogue!

Carine Roitfeld at Isabel Marant show
BREAKING NEWS!!


The ever so stylish Carine Roitfeld is LEAVING French Vogue at the end of January! Please Fashionistas, take out all your black now and wear in mourning. The incredibly stylish 56 year-old started as a model, moved into styling and became Tom Ford's muse. She has been the Editor-in-Chief of French Vogue since 2001. So why only ten years Carine?! Well Roitfeld told New York Time's, " I think it's time to do something different. I had so much freedom to do everything I wanted. I think I did a good job. When everything is good, maybe I think it's the time to do something else."  Her last issue will be March 2011 (Now i need to subscribe to ensure I get an issue!)  after which she has "no plan at all."




Of Course, the next question is, who will replace her?! Me!!! HAH! Don't I wish! 
Well, her sucessor has not yet been announced, but I'm sure it'll be announced in the next couple of weeks. And when it is, I'll let you all know!!! 




Till then my fellow fashionista's lets wear our LBD's in the most mournful and fashionable ways. 






Source: 
http://www.stylelist.com/2010/12/17/carine-roitfeld-leaves-french-vogue-after-10-years/

Friday, December 10, 2010

Tom Ford -The Truest Definition of a Fashion Designer


Photos By Steven Meisel, Dec. Vogue

       I've been experiencing the worst writer's block lately. I have been wanting to write something but i had just not been inspired. December's Vogue was the turning point. Writer Sarah Mower captured my heart in  "Mr. Ford Returns" and Steven Meisel, wow, he photos were outstanding. Please, go pick up the issue NOW if you are a true fashion junkie. This will feed your needs for quite some time.

      Every Fashionista who was NOT invited to Tom Ford's comeback to womenswear show after 6 years, has been DYING to see photos of the collection Tom Ford truly brought back the exclusivity to fashion. His collection will be sold only in his sixteen stores until next season and there will be no repeat of the launch show. Only magazine editors will be able to view his collection in his showroom in London. He describes his collection as, "The seventies is what I love. Soft, touchable beauty is what I love."
     As a fashion lover and I suppose, blogger (isn't that what I am doing now) the Internet is our prime source to gather and consume all that is fashion related. I love it. But since the use of Internet in fashion, the Fashion Cycle has been on a cracked out speed. Tom Ford notices that, he explains, "I do not understand everyone needs to see everything online the day after the show. I don't think it ultimately serves the customer, which is the wohle point of my business-not to serve the journalist of the fashion system". I am, according to Ford, a part of the 'journalist' - in a small scale- who is pushing this fast pace fashion system who wants to see things NOW. It has been the ultimate stylist game to nab the hottest looks off the runaway for their clients on red carpets, but Ford says, "Ill wait to see who is nominated for the Oscars. Then I will offer to dress one person". This guy is a Renegade (although, I don't think he would not be too happy to be called one.)  On the flip side, as a designer (that being my ultimate fashion goal) I can totally understand and respect Ford's business savy thinking.  
     The speed of the Fashion Cycle is something that fashion students are warned about. This cycle moves fast! Especially now because of the help from the Internet. Ford challenges that idea and aims to slow it down by creating classic, well made clothes of value. (Yes, that does mean expensive and likely out of my price range, but a girl can dream right?!) After designing for Gucci, and even calling the Gucci Girl being, "too trendy", Fords women's collection was made for his muses who he says, "beg" him to make them suits because they "cant find that anywhere!" (on a side note, how awesome would it be to have Tom Ford as your bestie?) Ford wants to make something of "intrinsic value". "I don't think fashion has to change every five minutes. I'd like these to be clothes you can wear for a long time- ten 20 year; pass on to your daughter". -I always tell my dad that buying designer, would be an investment!  
                     Ford has lived the high-speed fashion lifestyle because of his work for Gucci, YSL- even designing fifteen men's and women's collections in one year!!! He knows what sells and has even shined a light and believing in Alexander McQueen, Stella McCartney, Balenciaga and Bottega Venta! If you weren't certain before, know, Tom Ford really knows what he is doing! Now that he is no longer working for mega corporations like Gucci, he is really coming back and controlling his brand. "My goal is to be like Armani and Chanel." He is soo involved with his branding that he even sold an Andy Warhol self portrait for $32.6 million and spent the profit on his stores in Hong-Kong, Beijing and Shanghai after rejecting outside investors! This guy, he is doing things his way! I totally respect that!!

Photos by Steven Meisel, Dec. Vogue

    Tom Ford was known for being somewhat of a fashion bad boy. but as he said, "inhibitions are there for a reason." He has "cleaned up" his act and for once, can truly see that he is in fact a talented designer. "Maybe it is because I've learned over the past five or six years that I do have certain talents and gifts I maybe wasn't sure of before." -Crazy right!-. Tom Ford has built a business that I admire. He is creating, everything from makeup, men's and women's, even movies (A Single Man and a second movie, a comedy, in the works!)

 "The day i don't love to do it, I'll sell it. because we're only  here for a little while, and nothing we do or make has any permanence at all. I care now because I'm doing it. I want to be proud of what I do. Which may be ten or 20 years; who know?"

Photos by Steven Meisel Dec. Vogue



As a designer, I am looking forward to the day I gather the confidence that Mr. Ford has gained of the years. This article was beyond inspiring.  If you are even remotely interested in the industry, (which i assume if you are still reading, you MUST be) then this article is a MUST read. I only touched on the surface. I love reading things like this because it only further assures me that I am in the right field. 

I hope that you get the same feeling. Ultimately, LOVE WHAT YOU DO! and keep doing it until you don't love it anymore.


Xoxo,
Lidia.

Monday, November 29, 2010

Betty the Builder

Can we fix it? Yes we can!! Cynthia Rowley Tools  Picture this, you are living in your gorgeous town house in hip trendy Los Feilz in Los Angeles, or maybe in your beautiful loft apartment with a perfect view of the Marc Jacobs store in SoHo in NYC and BOOM, you have a tiny leak in your sink, be you don't sweat, your totally prepared to handle a situation like that, and of course in the most fashionable way.  

Just because we may live and breathe fashion and everything in between, it doesn't mean we aren't capable to do other things.  Even if we aren't handy with the tools and fix-it things we’d still want to look as fashionable as we could! Cynthia Rowley has just the tool set for us. We love that they include everything from a staple gun (who doesn’t appreciate a staple gun?) to an oh-so charming tape measure, level, and flashlight set. So not only can you impress others with your amazing DIY skills, but you can also save yourself from looking like a tool when doing so.


 

The Genuine Article by Cynthia Rowley Tool Sets are available at CynthiaRowley.com and in Cynthia Rowley stores. Each set is $25, as is the tote bag, while individual items are $10.
Printed Tool Set Tape Measure, Level, Flashlight
Printed Tool Set Hammer, Pliers, & Screwdriver
Printed Tool Set Craft Knife & Staple Gun
Tool Bag

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Sans Stylist?

              "Who are you wearing?" is really the most important question when stars walk down the red carpet. Often times the answer to that question is rehearsed. Celebrity-Celebrity stylist Rachel Zoe, is most "it girls" go to stylist for most events and press tours, yet, a few celebrity fashionista are refusing to use any stylist (or so they say-Blake Lively.) ;] 

These ladies have great style without the help of a stylist and really have a style of their own. 

Who: Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen
Say: Nothing. But it’s assumed.
Reality: Despite the fact that everyone thinks this dynamic design duo does it alone, they actually have worked with several stylists over the years, including Annabel Tollman and Estee Stanley.















at the MET Ball 2008 - thee most important fashion event ever!



Who: January Jones
Says: She loves fashion so much that she doesn’t want a stylist.
Reality: This, for the most part, is true. Jones is an avid vintage collector–which was evident long before she appeared on Mad Men–and she works with the same designers again and again, like Versace and Lanvin. While an assistant of some sort–whether it’s her own or someone at the network–surely traffics the samples, we’re confident Jones is making the decisions.










one of her best red-carpet looks



Who: Blake Lively
Says: She doesn’t need a stylist.
Reality: No, it doesn’t seem that Blake needs a stylist, because she has Eric DamanGossip Girl‘s costume designer, who clearly “helps her out” for big events. Eric thinks Blake is the next Jackie O, so I’m sure they collaborate quite often off-the-set.











She is famous for her "right of the runway" style 



 Who: Chloe Sevigny 
Says: uses stylist for big events, but her style is still innately her own. 
Reality: Chloe uses celeb stylist Ezra Woods for big events, but when Chole really gets it right, its usually because she styled her self. 













Chloe wearing Chloe at a store opening


for more: http://fashionista.com/2010/11/stars-sans-stylists-what-it-really-means/

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Where Has The Exclusivity Gone? I'll tell you!!!

FowardFashion.biz asks where the exclusivity has gone 

"While the gen pop rages over designer collaborations with discount or high-street retailers, the message that is being sent could be seen at a stab at high fashion.  While most are able to go to H&M and get a taste of Alber Elbaz for under $100, most would never dream of going on such fashion binges on the real thing.
Average folks storm the shelves of H&M and Target to get the likes of Alexander McQueen, Lanvin, and Sonia Rykiel, but where has the exclusivity gone?  It is rare to find such brands on closeout/ sample sale sites like HauteLook or Gilt, for reasons of brand image for these fashion houses, but wouldn’t it be better to see these looks at highly discounted prices rather than at stores that everyone has access to?
Not that I am against the collaborations at all, but in a way it demeans the value of the real thing.  People buy high fashion for many reasons, but the main outlining reasons are for the quality, the perfect fit and fabrication, and to be able to flaunt how much money you have dropped on such merch!  While the popularity of H&M rises, what is happening to labels like Lanvin?  People swoon over the images bloggers post with fashion icons like Anna Wintour, Agyness Deyn, or Karl Lagerfeld, because they are being offered something unattainable.  What happens next- when the unattainable is absolutely attainable?  The interest is lost.
Although this could be a bad analogy, imagine if you called the guy you just went out with 3 times in a row because he didn’t answer.  The line would probably be dead from the evident desperation and neediness.
We buy luxe because it is something we can pride ourselves in.  News has just broken out that Karl Lagerfeld will be designing a line for Macy’s.  Karl Lagerfeld is no stranger to collaborations, being one of the pioneers for such collaborations with H&M in 2004.  I am sure that the line will be amazing, but for such fashion fanatics it is sheer disappointment."


Well, I'll tell them!!
Personally,
I have to disagree with this post. Personally, as a young fashion lover who doesn’t have the expendable income to buy Karl via Chanel, I appreciate these collaborations.
Fashion is not about what you can afford, it is about how the you wear the clothes and personalize it. Fashion is personal.
Collaborations don’t demean the ‘real thing’ they challenge the high end lines to push the boundaries further! Can you imagine that fashion world. The cycle will never end, even if plain jane from the middle of nowhere Kansas sports Karl for Macy’s (which im tottallly excited for!! eeep!)
Fashion shouldn’t only be for some based on socio-economic status, it should be for everyone and anyone who appreciates it and makes it their own. 
And on that Note, I can not wait for Karl Lagerfeld's line for Macy's!! 

The Sexification of Fashion


Author and every Fashionista's best friend, Derek Blasberg writes about fashion and its close ties with sex, what is sexy and why there is such a focus on sex in Fashion. Where is this coming from? Why is everyone so obsessed with sex and being sexy? Derek explains:


photo by Flynet Pictures
January 12, 2010

THE SEXIFICATION OF FASHION

The tighter, the better; the shorter, the racier. Let's face it, these days, less seems to be more. How to wear sexy new trends without looking ridiculous.

Fashion editors are used to answering all sorts of sartorial inquiries: Who makes a good black trouser? Why does a handbag cost so much? How does anybody walk in those shoes? But at Paris Fashion Week in October, one stylist, inquiring on behalf of her very famous, very stylish celebrity client, was marching around the shows with an entirely modern question, one that left more than a few blushing: "Can someone tell me where the good sex shops are in this town?" For once, the editors were at a loss.

We're not at liberty to divulge just who was trolling naughty stores for kinky fashions, but, shockingly, a famous face looking to spice up her leather leggings with a nipple tassel wasn't the most scandalous occurrence in Paris. It seemed everyone had tapped into his or her erogenous zone, from Karl Lagerfeld ending his country-western Chanel show with a full-on haystack ménage à trois of models Freja Beha Erichsen, Lara Stone, and Baptiste Giabiconi to the endless banquette-hopping nights at the French capital's late-night hot spots, like Le Baron and Le Montana. Before I excused myself from a late-night rager in a suite at the Ritz in Paris, I witnessed the debauchery firsthand when a certain fashion photographer started drawing a bath for himself and three male models.

To say that modern culture — in our wardrobes and beyond — has reached a sexual crescendo is not an overstatement. Lady Gaga flat-out refuses to wear pants, and Shakira calls herself a she wolf, writhing around a giant cage wearing a flesh-colored body stocking. Recently, the hemlines on Gossip Girl have crept even higher (which some thought impossible) and fabrics got more sheer. Sienna Miller even brought sexy to Broadway, not an arena exactly known for its provocative style choices, when she sported a teeny-tiny peekaboo Balmain minidress to the opening-night party for her play After Miss Julie.

The formerly prim and proper social set has also deflated its over-the-top eveningwear for something more sexified. Hedge funder Julie Macklowe used to be the girl in the room wearing the biggest, brightest, loudest dress (who can forget the paint-splattered Dolce & Gabbana with a circus-tent skirt she purchased for the Costume Institute Gala in New York two years ago?), but now she sports Jason Wu minidresses and Louis Vuitton's over-the-knee boots. Same with social gadfly Lisa Maria Falcone, the brunette who swanned into society wearing not Oscar de la Renta or Carolina Herrera ball gowns but rather slashed metallic minidresses by Roberto Cavalli and Balenciaga.

The poster girl for Hollywood's new sexuality is Megan Fox, a woman many wrote off a few years ago as a loose-lipped Angelina Jolie look-alike. In these lean times of sexual expression, however, she's now box-office gold and the new face of Emporio Armani Underwear, a gig that she took over from Victoria Beckham and that reportedly paid her in the $2 million range after a bidding war with Versace.

The new modern sexuality has even made its way to Oprah Winfrey, who recently dedicated a whole show to the increased interest of women in pornographic materials. Discussing a woman's right to shop at sex stores, Oprah announced that reportedly one in three people watching porn online is a woman. Perhaps the most shocking part of the episode was that porn star Jenna Jameson, sitting on the same chair as so many previous illustrious Winfrey guests, looked super stylish in a blue one-shouldered cocktail frock.

A woman tarting up her lifestyle, according to many, can be traced back to a very familiar recent event: the Great Recession. Simon Doonan of Barneys New York explains, "Sex always looms large during a recession. The 1970s were an economically depressed time, but it was also a time of wild shagadelic abandon!" He adds that in times of monetary uncertainty, the most basic act of sex isn't expensive at all. "Maybe you can't afford a new condo or a couture blouse," he teases, "but hanky panky is free!" Estée Lauder executive John Demsey put it best. "When the going gets tough, the tough get sexy," he told me at a party in Manhattan.

New York's Upper East Side novelist Jill Kargman argues that a woman feeling a renewed sense of sexual energy and power in the light of the recession shouldn't be surprising. "Since men's egos are so wrapped up in their bank accounts, maybe their sex drive mirrors the Dow?" she wonders. "Perhaps women are trying to play into their fantasies more to lift spirits and electroshock them back from the dead? Maybe the excesses of the neo-Gilded Age numbed us all a bit and we're trying to whip up — pun intended! — some excitement."

"Why dress meekly when things look bleak?" the designer Antonio Berardi asks. He amped up the sexuality in his fashions, from a lace cutout dress Gwyneth Paltrow slithered into at a premiere in Paris to his collection of sheer-paneled pieces for spring. He agrees with Kargman that in this economy, it's all about a sexual woman and says, "Every once in a while fashion is dictated not by trends but by the need to feel sexy, to be adored, and to be wanted. Now more so than ever it's about playing the female card."

As is typical of the fashion industry, the revolution is being broadcast on its runways. Alexander Wang's entire spring collection could be described as a team of female football players as nymphomaniacs. Joining Wang's corset and miniskirt brigade, which included Jasmine Di Milo, Temperley London, and of course Jean Paul Gaultier, was designer Christian Cota. "I like corsets because they're the foundation and what's closest to the body," he says. "I wanted to strip it down to that, to just that sexual shape of a woman."

What is good to remember, for anyone trying to DIY her own sexiness, is that one needn't dress up like Rihanna, fashioning a top out of black barbed wire, as the singer does on her "Russian Roulette" CD cover. Instead of the heart-shaped glitter nipple pasties that were at Lindsay Lohan's debut collection at Emanuel Ungaro, why not try an over-the-knee boot? It's official: They're not just for prostitutes anymore! Or do like Julia Restoin Roitfeld and Daisy Lowe have done and invest in some garters and thigh-high stockings. Girl-about-town Byrdie Bell thinks we're in a completely new sexual climate: "I honestly think that if Janet Jackson's boob poked out during the Super Bowl this year, it wouldn't be such a big deal." Hence her go-to piece this fall, a girdle that she wears as a skirt and whose garter clasps she affixes to boots or tights (not to mention her I-slept-at-his-house hair). "Yeah, that was a good find: $38 in the underwear bin at Star Struck Vintage on Greenwich Avenue," she explains of the garment that is her trusted last-minute look.

Perhaps the biggest confirmation of these heightened sexualized times is Tom Ford's impending return to designing a women's clothing line. This is the man who shaved a Gucci logo into a model's nether regions for a 2003 ad campaign and once asked, "Why do we think being a slut's bad? Sluttiness is just a lot of freedom."

Meanwhile, Berardi says, "Sexy is about enticing, showing just enough to stimulate the imagination. Erogenous zones are a good start: a glimpse of thigh, the collarbone, a little cleavage." But he warns novices there's a difference between that and overshooting one's sexiness: "Slutty is just too much and totally wrong." In other words, ladies, wear underwear!